4.1 Review

Combination of Antidepressants in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 278-281

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318248581b

关键词

antidepressant agents; combination drug therapy; major depressive disorder

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that assessed the effect of the combination of antidepressants from the beginning of the treatment of major depressive disorder. Studies were retrieved from PubMed (1966 to August 2010), Cochrane Library (August 2010), Embase (1980 to August 2010), PsycINFO (1980 to August 2010), Lilacs (1982 to August 2010), clinical trials registry, thesis database (www.capes.gov.br), and secondary references. All randomized controlled trials that compared a combination of antidepressants with a single antidepressant from the beginning of the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults were included. Data analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.0. Of 3492 studies retrieved, five satisfied the inclusion criteria. In one study, only data about dropouts were included. Antidepressant combination was shown to be better than a single antidepressant considering remission (relative risk [RR], 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-4.35) and response (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.21-1.97). Mirtazapine plus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) was superior to an isolated SSRI for remission (RR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.06-3.33). Tricyclic antidepressant plus SSRI was superior to SSRI for remission and response (RR, 8.58; 95% CI, 1.70-43.32 and RR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.07-2.93, respectively). There was no difference between combined and monotherapy groups in dropouts owing to adverse effects. The results suggest that antidepressant combination is more efficient than a single antidepressant without a significant decrease in tolerability. However, the small number of clinical trials and methodological problems precludes definitive conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据