4.5 Article

Efficacy and Safety of Levomilnacipran Sustained Release in Moderate to Severe Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 74, 期 4, 页码 363-369

出版社

PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.12m08141

关键词

-

资金

  1. Forest Research Institute, Forest Laboratories Inc (New York, New York)
  2. Pierre Fabre Medicament (Toulouse, France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of levomilnacipran sustained release (SR), an antidepressant candidate in late-stage development, in major depressive disorder (MDD). Method: Between December 2006 and October 2007, a 10-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, flexible-dose trial assessed once-daily levomilnacipran SR (75 mg or 100 mg) in outpatients (18-70 years) meeting DSM-IV criteria for a major depressive episode (duration >= 1 month) with a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) score >22 and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) score >= 10. Levomilnacipran SR dose was increased to 100 mg/d over 12 days. The primary efficacy measure was Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score change from baseline to week 10; secondary efficacy measures were the HDRS17, SDS, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale, and MADRS response >= 50% decrease from baseline) and remission (score 10). Safety was evaluated according to adverse events, laboratory investigations, and vital signs/physical findings. Results: Efficacy analyses included 276 levomilnacipran SR-treated patients and 277 placebo-treated patients. Levomilnacipran SR was significantly superior to placebo on MADRS total score change from baseline to week 10 (least squares mean difference [LSMD]=-4.2 [95% CI, -5.7 to -2.6]; P<.0001). Statistical significance in favor of levomilnacipran SR was demonstrated on change from baseline to week 10 in HDRS17 total score (LSMD=-3.4 [95% CI, -4.7 to -2.2]; P < .0001) and SDS total score (LSMD=-3.4 [95% CI, -4.6 to -2.2]; P < .0001) and subscales. Significantly more levomilnacipran SR patients versus placebo patients achieved MADRS response (59.1% vs 42.2%; P < .0001) and remission (46.4% vs 26.0%; P < .0001). Levomilnacipran SR was generally safe and well tolerated; more levomilnacipran SR patients (9.4%) versus placebo patients (6.5%) discontinued due to adverse events, but more placebo patients versus levomilnacipran SR patients discontinued overall (24.9% vs 20.2%). Conclusions: Levomilnacipran SR demonstrated robust efficacy on all measures and was generally well tolerated. (C) Copyright 2013 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据