4.5 Article

Agomelatine in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: An 8-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 616-626

出版社

PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.09m05471blu

关键词

-

资金

  1. Forest
  2. Johnson Johnson
  3. Novartis
  4. Organon
  5. Pamlab
  6. Pfizer
  7. Sepracor
  8. Shire
  9. Takeda
  10. Vanda
  11. Wyeth
  12. Abbott
  13. Alkermes
  14. Aspect Medical Systems
  15. Bio Research
  16. BrainCells
  17. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  18. Cephalon
  19. Clinical Trial Solutions
  20. Eli Lilly
  21. Ganeden
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Lichtwer Pharma
  24. Lorex
  25. NARSAD
  26. NCCAM
  27. NIDA
  28. NIMH
  29. Pharmavite
  30. Roche
  31. Sanofi-Aventis
  32. Solvay
  33. Synthelabo
  34. Wyeth-Ayerst
  35. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  36. Targacept
  37. Fabre-
  38. Fabre-Kramer
  39. Janssen
  40. Neuronetics
  41. Otsuka

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fixed-dose agomelatine 25 and 50 mg/d in the treatment of outpatients with moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder (MDD) compared to placebo. Method: In this 8-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trial, patients with DSM-IV-defined MDD were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive a once-daily dose of agomelatine 25 mg, agomelatine 50 mg, or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 8 in the clinician-rated 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17); other efficacy measures were the clinical remission and response rates (measured by HDRS17), Clinical Global Impressions scales, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, subjective measures on sleep, and the overall quality of life. The study was conducted between December 2006 and January 2008. Results: Agomelatine 25 mg/d was more efficacious based on the HDRS17 total score (P = .01) compared to placebo throughout the treatment period, whereas for agomelatine 50 mg/d, statistically significant reduction in HDRS17 total score could be observed from weeks 2 to 6 but not at week 8 (P = .144). A higher proportion of patients receiving agomelatine 25 mg/d showed clinical response (P = .013), clinical remission (P = .07), and improvement according to the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (P = .065) compared to those receiving placebo. No statistically significant difference between patients receiving agomelatine 50 mg/d compared to placebo on clinical response (P = .116) or clinical remission (P = .457) was observed. HADS score, quality of sleep, and quality of life significantly improved with agomelatine 25 mg/d compared to placebo. Both agomelatine doses were safe and well tolerated, although clinically notable aminotransferase elevations were observed transiently in the agomelatine 50 mg/d group. Conclusions: Agomelatine 25 mg/d was effective in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe MDD and was safe and well tolerated. Agomelatine 50 mg/d provided evidence for its antidepressant efficacy until week 6 and was also safe and well tolerated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据