4.2 Article

Invasive fungal infections: epidemiology and analysis of antifungal prescriptions in onco-haematology

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2010.01166.x

关键词

antifungals; epidemiology; invasive fungal diseases; onco-haematology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>What is known and Objective: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly in onco-haematology patients. We aimed to study the epidemiology of IFI in neutropenic patients and estimate the economic impact of treatment of those infections. Methods: All patients hospitalized in onco-haematology, and treated with antifungal agents, in 2005 were investigated. Four features were studied: the diagnosis for each patient, the antifungal drugs used, the thoracic densitometry reports and the sero-mycological data. Infectious episodes were stratified according to the EORTC 2008 classification criteria (10). Results and Discussion: Of the 1130 patients surveyed, 192 patients received systemic antifungal agents. Of these 46% had acute leukaemia, 29% bone-marrow allografts, 7% lymphoma and 18% other malignant haemopathies. Using the EORTC 2008 criteria (10), there were 8 proved IFI (3 aspergillosis, 3 candidosis and 2 other IFI), 17 probable IFI (11 aspergillosis, 6 candidosis) and 16 possible aspergillosis. The incidence of IFI was 2 center dot 1%. Eighty patients (41 center dot 7%) had received prophylaxis: 56 with fluconazole and 24 with voriconazole. Treatment was most often empirical (n = 127, 66 center dot 1%). Combination of two antifungals was used in 17 cases. The mean duration of prophylactic, empirical, proved/probable aspergillosis-directed, candidaemia-directed and combination treatment was 19, 19, 46, 32 and 27 days, respectively. The cost of antifungal treatment in 2005 reached almost 2 000 000euro, including 427 000euro for documented infections (proved and probable), 1 246 000euro for empirical treatment and 58 300euro for prophylaxis. What is new and Conclusion: The incidence of IFI is low but the pharmacoeconomic impact is extremely high. Improved strategies are required to reduce the frequency and duration of empirical treatment without compromising beneficial outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据