4.1 Article

The Targeted Oral, Once-Daily Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor Roflumilast and the Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist Montelukast Do Not Exhibit Significant Pharmacokinetic Interactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 389-397

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1177/0091270008330980

关键词

Drug interaction; roflumilast; montelukast

资金

  1. Nycomed GmbH (formerly ALTANA Pharma AG), Konstanz, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This nonrandomized, fixed-sequence, 3-period study investigated potential pharmacokinetic interactions between the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast, approved for the treatment of asthma, and roflumilast, an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor in clinical development for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pharmacokinetic interactions are of interest because both drugs may be coadministered and share a common metabolic pathway via cytochrome P450 3A. Single-dose montelukast (10 mg, po) was administered alone in period 1, followed by repeated once-daily roflumilast alone (500 mu g, po) for 12 days (period 2). In period 3, 500 mu g qd roflumilast was coadministered with 10 mg qd montelukast for 8 days. Different pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated for montelukast alone, for steady-state roflumilast and its pharmacologically active metabolite roflumilast N-oxide alone, for single-dose-montelukast when coadministered with steady-state roflumilast, and for steady-state roflumilast and its N-oxide metabolite when coadministered with steady-state montelukast. The AUC and C-max of montelukast were modestly increased by 9% and 8%, respectively, when single-dose montelukast was coadministered with steady-state roflumilast. The pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide in steady state remained unchanged when repeat-dose montelukast was coadministered at steady-state. Concomitant administration of both drugs was well tolerated. These findings suggest that no dose adjustment is warranted for either drug when roflumilast and montelukast are coadministered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据