4.6 Article

Gender differences in the association between metabolic syndrome and periodontal disease: the Hisayama Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 743-752

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12119

关键词

gender difference; metabolic syndrome; periodontal disease; structural equation model

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan, Tokyo, Japan [22390401, 22406034, 23390483]
  2. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24590796, 24792356, 26330045, 22390401, 25253048, 22406034, 23390483, 22116010, 23390482, 24659937] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Periodontal disease and metabolic syndrome (MS) are more prevalent in males than in females. However, whether there is a gender difference in the association between these health conditions has not yet been investigated. This study examined the gender difference in this association, considering the definition of periodontal disease. Materials and Methods We recruited 1040 males and 1330 females, aged 40years, with at least ten teeth from subjects of the 2007 Hisayama health examination. We performed a logistic regression analysis with various definitions of periodontal disease the dependent variable and MS as the independent variable. Following the analysis, the data were reanalysed with the structural equations model. Results The logistic regression analysis suggested a stronger association between periodontal disease and MS in females than that in males when periodontal disease was more severely defined. When we constructed the structural equations model in each gender, the model showed a good fit to the data of females, suggesting the association between periodontal disease and MS in females, but not in males. Conclusions Gender differences seem to exist in the association between periodontal disease and MS; MS might show a stronger association with periodontal disease in females than in males.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据