4.6 Article

Er:YAG laser treatment in supportive periodontal therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 483-489

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01857.x

关键词

attachment level; Er:YAG laser; microbiology; supportive periodontal treatment

资金

  1. New Working Group Periodontology (NAgP, Heusenstamm, Germany)
  2. KaVo (Biberach/Riss, Germany)
  3. Hain LifeScience (Nehren, Germany)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess clinical and microbiological outcomes of an Er:YAG laser in comparison with sonic debridement in the treatment of persistent periodontal pockets in a prospective randomized controlled multicentre study design. Material and Methods: A total of 78 patients in supportive periodontal therapy with two residual pockets were included, 58 were available for the whole follow-up period. Root surfaces were instrumented either with a sonic scaler (Sonicflex (R) 2003 L) or with an Er: YAG laser (KEY Laser (R) 3). Clinical attachment levels (CAL), Probing depths (PD), Plaque control record (PCR) and Bleeding on probing (BOP) were assessed at baseline, 13 and 26 weeks after treatment. In addition, microbiological analysis was performed employing a DNA diagnostic test kit (micro-IDent (R) Plus). Results: Probing depths and CAL were significantly reduced in both groups over time (p < 0.05), without significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). BOP frequency values decreased significantly within both groups (p < 0.05), with no difference between the laser and the sonic treatment (p > 0.05). PCR frequency values did not change during the observation period (p > 0.05). Microbiological analysis failed to expose any significant difference based on treatment group or period. Conclusion: Employing both sonic and laser treatment procedures during supportive periodontal care, similar clinical and microbiological outcomes can be expected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据