4.6 Article

Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 90-98

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12027

关键词

bone regeneration; bone substitute; cone-beam CT; graft material; human; RCT; socket preservation

资金

  1. Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science
  2. Clinic of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology
  3. Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  4. Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland
  5. Degradable Solutions AG, Schlieren, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To evaluate the radiographic changes of the alveolar ridge following application of different ridge preservation techniques 6 months after tooth extraction. Materials and Methods Four treatment modalities were randomly assigned in 40 patients: beta-tricalcium-phosphate-particles with polylactid coating (beta-TCP), demineralized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen covered with a collagen matrix (DBBM-C/CM), DBBM-C covered with an autogenous soft-tissue graft (DBBM-C/PG) and spontaneous healing (control). Cone-beam computed tomography scans were performed after treatment and 6 months later. Results After 6 months, the vertical changes ranged between -0.6 mm (-10.2%) for control and a gain of 0.3 mm (5.6%) for DBBM-C/PG on the lingual side, and between -2.0 mm (-20.9%) for beta-TCP and a gain of 1.2 mm (8.1%) for DBBM-C/PG on the buccal side. The most accentuated ridge width changes were recorded 1 mm below the crest: -3.3 mm (-43.3%, C), -6.1 mm (-77.5%, beta-TCP), -1.2 mm (-17.4%, DBBM-C/CM) and -1.4 mm (-18.1%, DBBM-C/PG). At all three levels, DBBM-C with either CM or PG was not significantly differing (p > 0.05), while most other differences between the groups reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). Conclusions Application of DBBM-C, covered with CM or PG, resulted in less vertical and horizontal changes of the alveolar ridge as compared with controls 6 months after extraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据