4.6 Article

Pattern and rate of progression of periodontal attachment loss in an urban population of South Brazil: a 5-years population-based prospective study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 1-9

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01818.x

关键词

attachment loss; demographics; longitudinal studies; periodontal disease; epidemiology; periodontitis

资金

  1. Foundation for Post-Graduate Education (CAPES), Brasilia, Brazil [1614/99-1]
  2. Foundation for Research Support of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil [PPSUS-0700481]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: The aim of this 5-years longitudinal study was to investigate the pattern and rate of periodontal attachment loss (PAL) progression in an urban population in South Brazil. Methods: In 2001, a multistage probability sampling strategy was used to derive a representative sample of 1,465 dentate individuals from Porto Alegre, Brazil. Five years later, 697 dentate individuals (294M/403F, mean age: 37.9 +/- 13.3) were available for follow-up. PAL was assessed by calibrated examiners using a full-mouth protocol. Estimates of proximal PAL progression and standard errors (SE) are reported. Results: Fifty-six per cent (SE: 1.9) and 36% (SE: 1.8) of subjects showed PAL progression >= 3 mm affecting >= 2 and >= 4 teeth respectively. PAL progression >= 3 mm was mostly localized affecting 3.8 (SE: 0.2) teeth and 5.7 (SE: 0.3) sites. Annual PAL progression was, on average, 0.3 mm (SE: 0.01). Significant differences in PAL progression were observed according to age, gender, race and socioeconomic status. PAL progression increased with age reaching the highest progression rate in the 40-49 years cohort, and then decreased in older age groups. PAL progression was consistently higher among males and non-Whites than females and whites. Conclusion: A large proportion of this urban Brazilian sample was affected by PAL progression underscoring the need for health promotion initiatives aiming at preventing progression of destructive periodontal disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据