4.6 Article

Validation of human periodontal ligament-derived cells as a reliable source for cytotherapeutic use

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 1088-1099

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01597.x

关键词

cytotherapy; gene expression profile; marker gene; periodontal ligament cells; regenerative medicine; transplantation; validation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [20791479]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20791479] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim Periodontal ligament (PDL) is a reliable cell source for periodontal regeneration. In this study, an optimal protocol for the extraction, expansion, and characterization of human PDL (hPDL) cells was examined for clinical trials. Materials and Methods hPDL tissues were obtained from 41 surgically extracted teeth and digested with enzymes. Human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs), bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMMSCs), and gingival fibroblasts (hGFs) were used for comparison. For each sample, the proliferative capacity, colony-forming ability, alkaline phosphatase activity, differentiation ability, the cell surface antigens, gene expression, and regenerative potential were examined. Results hPDL cells were more successfully extracted with collagenase/dispase [29/30 (96.7%)] than with trypsin/EDTA [8/11 (72.7%)], and exhibited osteogenic potential both in vitro and in vivo. The proliferation of hPDL cells was rapid at a low cell density. hPDL cells frequently differentiated into cementoblastic/osteoblastic lineage (similar to 60%). In contrast, their adipogenic and chondrogenic potentials were lower than those of hADSCs and hBMMSCs. Some genes (NCAM1, S100A4, and periostin) were preferentially expressed in hPDL cells compared with those of hBMMSCs and hGFs. Immunohistochemical studies revealed the expressions of S100A4 and periostin in hPDL tissue. Conclusion A protocol for the successful cultivation and validation of hPDL cells is proposed for clinical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据