4.6 Article

An R2R3-MYB transcription factor regulates carotenoid pigmentation in Mimulus lewisii flowers

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 209, 期 3, 页码 1049-1057

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13647

关键词

carotenoid biosynthesis; flower color; monkeyflowers (Mimulus); MYB transcription factor; pigmentation

资金

  1. University of Connecticut start-up funds
  2. University of Connecticut Research Foundation
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1243565] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carotenoids are yellow, orange, and red pigments that contribute to the beautiful colors and nutritive value of many flowers and fruits. The structural genes in the highly conserved carotenoid biosynthetic pathway have been well characterized in multiple plant systems, but little is known about the transcription factors that control the expression of these structural genes. By analyzing a chemically induced mutant of Mimulus lewisii through bulk segregant analysis and transgenic experiments, we have identified an R2R3-MYB, Reduced Carotenoid Pigmentation 1 (RCP1), as the first transcription factor that positively regulates carotenoid biosynthesis during flower development. Loss-of-function mutations in RCP1 lead to down-regulation of all carotenoid biosynthetic genes and reduced carotenoid content in M. lewisii flowers, a phenotype recapitulated by RNA interference in the wild-type background. Overexpression of this gene in the rcp1 mutant background restores carotenoid production and, unexpectedly, results in simultaneous decrease of anthocyanin production in some transgenic lines by down-regulating the expression of an activator of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Identification of transcriptional regulators of carotenoid biosynthesis provides the 'toolbox' genes for understanding the molecular basis of flower color diversification in nature and for potential enhancement of carotenoid production in crop plants via genetic engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据