4.6 Article

Sex-biased gene expression in dioecious garden asparagus (Asparagus officinalis)

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 207, 期 3, 页码 883-892

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13389

关键词

dioecy; garden asparagus (Asparagus officinalis); RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq); sex chromosomes; transcriptome

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0951071, DEB-0841988]
  2. University of Georgia
  3. Limgroup (Horst, the Netherlands)
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1501589] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0922742] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sex chromosomes have evolved independently in phylogenetically diverse flowering plant lineages. The genes governing sex determination in dioecious species remain unknown, but theory predicts that the linkage of genes influencing male and female function will spur the origin and early evolution of sex chromosomes. For example, in an XY system, the origin of an active Y may be spurred by the linkage of female suppressing and male promoting genes. Garden asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) serves as a model for plant sex chromosome evolution, given that it has recently evolved an XX/XY sex chromosome system. In order to elucidate the molecular basis of gender differences and sex determination, we used RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) to identify differentially expressed genes between female (XX), male (XY) and supermale (YY) individuals. We identified 570 differentially expressed genes, and showed that significantly more genes exhibited male-biased than female-biased expression in garden asparagus. In the context of anther development, we identified genes involved in pollen microspore and tapetum development that were specifically expressed in males and supermales. Comparative analysis of genes in the Arabidopsis thaliana, Zea mays and Oryza sativa anther development pathways shows that anther sterility in females probably occurs through interruption of tapetum development before microspore meiosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据