4.6 Article

The receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase PCRK1 contributes to pattern-triggered immunity against Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 207, 期 1, 页码 78-90

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13345

关键词

Arabidopsis; flg22; immunity; pathogen; microbe-associated molecular pattern (PAMP; MAMP); pattern-triggered immunity (PTI); Pseudomonas syringae; PTI COMPROMISED RECEPTOR-LIKE CYTOPLASMIC KINASE 1 (PCRK1); receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-0925375, IOS-1121425]
  2. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [0925375, 1121425, 1353854] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper we describe PATTERN-TRIGGERED IMMUNITY (PTI) COMPROMISED RECEPTOR-LIKE CYTOPLASMIC KINASE 1 (PCRK1) of Arabidopsis thaliana, an RLCK that is important for defense against the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326 (Pma ES4326). We examined defense responses such as bacterial growth, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and callose deposition in pcrk1 mutant plants to determine the role of PCRK1 during pathogen infection. Expression of PCRK1 was induced following pathogen infection. Pathogen growth was significantly higher in pcrk1 mutant lines than in wild-type Col-0. Mutant pcrk1 plants showed reduced pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) against Pma ES4326 after pretreatment with peptides derived from flagellin (flg22), elongation factor-Tu (elf18), or an endogenous protein (pep1). Deposition of callose was reduced in pcrk1 plants, indicating a role of PCRK1 in activation of early immune responses. A PCRK1 transgene containing a mutation in a conserved lysine residue important for phosphorylation activity of kinases (K118E) failed to complement a pcrk1 mutant for the Pma ES4326 growth phenotype. Our study shows that PCRK1 plays an important role during PTI and that a conserved lysine residue in the putative kinase domain is important for PCRK1 function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据