4.6 Article

Functional analysis of the Fusarium graminearum phosphatome

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 207, 期 1, 页码 119-134

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13374

关键词

Fusarium graminearum; mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways; mycotoxin; phosphatome; virulence

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research and Development Program [2013CB127802]
  2. National Science Foundation [31171881, 31272000]
  3. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201303016]
  4. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-3-1-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphatases are known to play important roles in the regulation of various cellular processes in eukaryotes. However, systematic characterization of the phosphatome has not been reported in phytopathogenic fungi. The wheat scab fungus Fusarium graminearum contains 82 putative phosphatases. The biological functions of each phosphatase were investigated in this study. Although 11 phosphatase genes appeared to be essential, deletion mutants of the other 71 phosphatase genes were obtained and characterized for changes in 15 phenotypes, including vegetative growth, nutrient response and virulence. Overall, the deletion of 63 phosphatase genes resulted in changes in at least one of the phenotypes assayed. Interestingly, the deletion of four genes (Fg06297, Fg03333, Fg03826 and Fg07932) did not dramatically affect hyphal growth, but led to strongly reduced virulence. Western blot analyses showed that three phosphatases (Fg10516, Fg03333 and Fg12867) functioned as negative regulators of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. In addition, we found, for the first time, that FgCdc14 is dispensable for growth, but plays an important role in ribosome biogenesis. Overall, in this first functional characterization of the fungal phosphatome, phosphatases important for various aspects of hyphal growth, development, plant infection and secondary metabolism were identified in the phytopathogenic fungus F.graminearum. See also the Commentary by Jia and Tang

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据