4.6 Article

Gene coevolution and regulation lock cyclic plant defence peptides to their targets

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 210, 期 2, 页码 717-730

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13789

关键词

albumin; Clitoria ternatea (butterfly pea); cyclotide; defence peptide; gene co-option; gene expansion; nematicide

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage grant [LP130100550]
  2. ARC [DP150100443]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP130100550] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plants have evolved many strategies to protect themselves from attack, including peptide toxins that are ribosomally synthesized and thus adaptable directly by genetic polymorphisms. Certain toxins in Clitoria ternatea (butterfly pea) are cyclic cystine-knot peptides of c. 30 residues, called cyclotides, which have co-opted the plant's albumin-1 gene family for their production. How butterfly pea albumin-1 genes were commandeered and how these cyclotides are utilized in defence remain unclear. The role of cyclotides in host plant ecology and biotechnological applications requires exploration. We characterized the sequence diversity and expression dynamics of precursor and processing proteins implicated in butterfly pea cyclotide biosynthesis by expression profiling through RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). Peptide-enriched extracts from various organs were tested for activity against insect-like membranes and the model nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. We found that the evolution and deployment of cyclotides involved their diversification to exhibit different chemical properties and expression between organs facing different defensive challenges. Cyclotide-enriched fractions from soil-contacting organs were effective at killing nematodes, whereas similar enriched fractions from aerial organs contained cyclotides that exhibited stronger interactions with insect-like membrane lipids. Cyclotides are employed as versatile and combinatorial mediators of defence in C.ternatea and have specialized to affect different classes of attacking organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据