4.7 Article

Risk of Diabetes Mellitus in Long-Term Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 32, 期 29, 页码 3257-+

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.4379

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Recently, an increased risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) was observed after abdominal irradiation for childhood cancer. Because many Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors have also been treated with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy, we evaluated the association between HL treatment and DM risk. Patients and Methods Our study cohort comprised 2,264 5-year HL survivors, diagnosed before age 51 years and treated between 1965 and 1995. Treatment and follow-up information was collected from medical records and general practitioners. Radiation dosimetry was performed to estimate radiation dose to the pancreas. Cumulative incidence of DM was estimated, and risk factors for DM were evaluated by using Cox regression. Results After a median follow-up of 21.5 years, 157 patients developed DM. Overall cumulative incidence of DM after 30 years was 8.3% (95% CI, 6.9% to 9.8%). After para-aortic radiation with >= 36 Gy, the 30-year cumulative incidence of DM was 14.2% (95% CI, 10.7% to 18.3%). Irradiation with >= 36 Gy to the para-aortic lymph nodes and spleen was associated with a 2.30-fold increased risk of DM (95% CI, 1.54- to 3.44-fold) whereas para-aortic radiation alone with >= 36 Gy was associated with a 1.82-fold increased risk (95% CI, 1.02-to 3.25-fold). Lower doses (10 to 35 Gy) did not significantly increase risk of DM. The risk of DM significantly increased with higher mean radiation doses to the pancreatic tail (P < .001). Conclusion Radiation to the para-aortic lymph nodes increases the risk of developing DM in 5-year HL survivors. Screening for DM should be considered in follow-up guidelines for HL survivors, and treating physicians should be alert to this increased risk. (C) 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据