4.7 Article

Role of Imaging in the Staging and Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 32, 期 27, 页码 3048-+

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5229

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Recent advances in imaging, use of prognostic indices, and molecular profiling techniques have the potential to improve disease characterization and outcomes in lymphoma. International trials are under way to test image-based response-adapted treatment guided by early interim positron emission tomography (PET) - computed tomography (CT). Progress in imaging is influencing trial design and affecting clinical practice. In particular, a five-point scale to grade response using PET-CT, which can be adapted to suit requirements for early-and late-response assessment with good interobserver agreement, is becoming widely used both in practice-and response-adapted trials. A workshop held at the 11th International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas (ICML) in 2011 concluded that revision to current staging and response criteria was timely. Methods An imaging working group composed of representatives from major international cooperative groups was asked to review the literature, share knowledge about research in progress, and identify key areas for research pertaining to imaging and lymphoma. Results A working paper was circulated for comment and presented at the Fourth International Workshop on PET in Lymphoma in Menton, France, and the 12th ICML in Lugano, Switzerland, to update the International Harmonisation Project guidance regarding PET. Recommendations were made to optimize the use of PET-CT in staging and response assessment of lymphoma, including qualitative and quantitative methods. Conclusion This article comprises the consensus reached to update guidance on the use of PET-CT for staging and response assessment for [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lymphomas in clinical practice and late-phase trials. (C) 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据