4.7 Article

Phase II Study of Imatinib in Advanced Chordoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 914-920

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.3656

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Novartis Farma, Origgio, Italy
  2. Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To explore the antitumor activity of imatinib in patients with advanced platelet-derived growth factor beta (PDGFB)/PDGF receptor beta (PDGFRB)-positive chordomas. Patients and Methods In a collaborative Italian-Swiss, prospective, phase II clinical study conducted from November 2004 through April 2006, 56 patients with advanced PDGFB and/or PDGFRB chordoma received 800 mg/d of imatinib until progression. The primary end point was the overall tumor response rate (ORR), defined by RECIST. Secondary, exploratory end points included tissue response (ie, changes in tumor density or signal intensity/contrast enhancement, and/or [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography [PET] uptake), overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and pain score. Results Among 50 patients evaluable by RECIST, the best response was one partial response (PR) obtained at 6 months (ORR, 2%). There were 35 patients with stable disease (SD, 70%) and a 64% clinical benefit rate (ie, RECIST complete response + PR + SD >= 6 months). A minor dimensional response (<20%) was detected in nine patients. A maximum standard uptake value decrease >= 25% was observed in 10 (39%) of 26 patients evaluable for PET response at 3 months. Changes in the Brief Pain Inventory score were consistent with the response assessment. Median PFS (intention-to-treat population, 56 patients) was 9 months. No unexpected toxicities were observed. Conclusion This is the largest phase II study in chordoma to date. It confirms anecdotal evidence that imatinib has antitumor activity in this orphan disease, and therefore, it is worth further investigation. J Clin Oncol 30: 914-920. (C) 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据