4.6 Article

Finite-key security analysis of quantum key distribution with imperfect light sources

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/9/093011

关键词

quantum key distribution; security analysis; quantum optics

资金

  1. JSPS [25247068]
  2. Galician Regional Government (program 'Ayudas para proyectos de investigacion desarrollados por investigadores emergentes', and consolidation of Research Units: AtlantTIC)
  3. Spanish Government [TEC2014-54898-R]
  4. National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT) of Japan (Project 'Secure Photonic Network Technology' as part of Project UQCC)
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25247068] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, the gap between theory and practice in quantum key distribution (QKD) has been significantly narrowed, particularly for QKD systems with arbitrarily flawed optical receivers. The status for QKD systems with imperfect light sources is however less satisfactory, in the sense that the resulting secure key rates are often overly dependent on the quality of state preparation. This is especially the case when the channel loss is high. Very recently, to overcome this limitation, Tamaki et al proposed a QKD protocol based on the so-called 'rejected data analysis', and showed that its security-in the limit of infinitely long keys-is almost independent of any encoding flaw in the qubit space, being this protocol compatible with the decoy state method. Here, as a step towards practical QKD, we show that a similar conclusion is reached in the finite-key regime, even when the intensity of the light source is unstable. More concretely, we derive security bounds for a wide class of realistic light sources and show that the bounds are also efficient in the presence of high channel loss. Our results strongly suggest the feasibility of long distance provably secure communication with imperfect light sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据