4.6 Article

Covariance mapping of two-photon double core hole states in C2H2 and C2H6 produced by an x-ray free electron laser

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/073002

关键词

double core hole; free electron laser; few-photon process; covariance mapping

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Goran Gustafsson Foundation (UU/KTH)
  3. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden
  4. EPSRC, UK [EP/F034601/1, EP/I032517/1]
  5. MIUR, Italy [FIRB-RBAP045JF2, FIRB-RBAP06AWK3]
  6. MEXT
  7. JSPS
  8. Cooperative Research Program of Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices from MEXT
  9. Asahi Glass foundation
  10. US Department of Energy of Science, Basic Energy Science, Chemical, Geosciences, and Biological Divisions
  11. EPSRC [EP/I032517/1, EP/F034601/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I032517/1, EP/F034601/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K04755, 25108003, 26390019] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few-photon ionization and relaxation processes in acetylene (C2H2) and ethane (C2H6) were investigated at the linac coherent light source x-ray free electron laser (FEL) at SLAC, Stanford using a highly efficient multi-particle correlation spectroscopy technique based on a magnetic bottle. The analysis method of covariance mapping has been applied and enhanced, allowing us to identify electron pairs associated with double core hole (DCH) production and competing multiple ionization processes including Auger decay sequences. The experimental technique and the analysis procedure are discussed in the light of earlier investigations of DCH studies carried out at the same FEL and at third generation synchrotron radiation sources. In particular, we demonstrate the capability of the covariance mapping technique to disentangle the formation of molecular DCH states which is barely feasible with conventional electron spectroscopy methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据