4.7 Article

Phase II Trial of Single-Agent Bevacizumab Followed by Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan at Tumor Progression in Recurrent Glioblastoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 740-745

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3055

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To evaluate single-agent activity of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients and Methods Patients with recurrent glioblastoma were treated with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. After tumor progression, patients were immediately treated with bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan 340 mg/m(2) or 125 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks, depending on use of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs. Complete patient evaluations were repeated every 4 weeks. Results Forty-eight heavily pretreated patients were accrued to this study. Thromboembolic events (12.5%), hypertension (12.5%), hypophosphatemia (6%), and thrombocytopenia (6%) were the most common drug-associated adverse events. Six patients (12.5%) were removed from study for drug-associated toxicity (five thromboembolic events, one bowel perforation). Thirty-four patients (71%) and 17 patients (35%) achieved radiographic response based on Levin and Macdonald criteria, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 weeks (95% Cl, 12 to 26 weeks). The 6-month PFS was 29% (95% Cl, 18% to 48%). The 6-month overall survival was 57% (95% Cl, 44% to 75%). Median overall survival was 31 weeks (95% Cl, 21 to 54 weeks). Early magnetic resonance imaging response (first 96 hours and 4 weeks) was predictive of long-term PFS, with the Levin criteria being more predictive than Macdonald criteria. Of 19 patients treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan at progression, there were no objective radiographic responses. Eighteen patients (95%) experienced disease progression by the second cycle, and the median PFS was 30 days. Conclusion We conclude that single-agent bevacizumab has significant biologic and antiglioma activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据