4.7 Article

Prevention of coagulase-negative staphylococcal central venous catheter-related infection using urokinase rinses: A Randomized double-blind controlled trial in patients with Hematologic malignancies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 428-433

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.7754

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Fibrin deposition at the intraluminal surface of the indwelling part of the central venous catheter (CVC) surface increases the risk of CVC-related coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) infection. Therefore, repetitive enzymatic dissolution of fibrin by urokinase might reduce the risk of CVC-related infection. We undertook this study to investigate whether three times weekly urokinase rinsing of CVC reduces the incidence or severity of CVC-related infections by CoNS in patients undergoing intensive cytotoxic treatment for hematologic malignancies. Patients and Methods In a double-blind setting, all consecutive patients with a CVC were randomly allocated to receive either urokinase rinses ( 5 mL of 5,000 U/mL) or placebo ( saline), both three times weekly. Results The percentage of patients with at least one positive culture with CoNS was lower in patients receiving urokinase compared with patients receiving placebo (26% v 42%, respectively; relative risk [RR] = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.94). Major CVC-related CoNS infection occurred less frequently in patients receiving urokinase versus placebo (1.2% v 14.1%, respectively; RR = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.50). Secondary complications, including CVC-related thrombosis, were observed less frequently in the urokinase group compared with the placebo group (1.3% v 9.0%, respectively; RR = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.82). No severe bleeding complications attributable to urokinase were observed. Conclusion Three times weekly urokinase rinsing reduces the incidence of CVC-related CoNS infection in patients treated with intensive cytotoxic therapy for hematologic malignancies, with acceptable safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据