4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Long-term results from a randomized phase II trial of standard- versus higher-dose imatinib mesylate for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing KIT

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 620-625

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4403

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The outcome of patients diagnosed with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor ( GIST) and treated long-term with imatinib mesylate is unknown. A previous report of a randomized phase II trial of imatinib mesylate in patients with incurable GIST detailed high response rates at both the 400 and the 600 mg/d dose levels. We conducted a long-term analysis of patients treated on the trial, including patients followed during an extension phase, to evaluate survival, patterns of failure, and potential prognostic factors, including tumor mutational status. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced GIST were enrolled onto an open-label, multicenter trial and were randomly assigned ( 1: 1) to receive imatinib 400 versus 600 mg/d. Data were prospectively collected on KIT mutational status, total tumor area, and other potential prognostic factors. Patients were followed for a median of 63 months. Results One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled: 73 were in arm A ( imatinib 400 mg/d), and 74 were in arm B ( imatinib 600 mg/d). Response rates, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were essentially identical on both arms, and median survival was 57 months for all patients. Forty-one patients overall ( 28%) remained on the drug long-term. Female sex, the presence of an exon 11 mutation, and normal albumin and neutrophil levels were independently associated with better survival. Conclusion Nearly 50% of patients with advanced GIST who were treated with imatinib mesylate survived for more than 5 years, regardless of a 400 or 600 mg/d starting dose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据