4.7 Review

Prostate cancer stem cells: A new target for therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 26, 期 17, 页码 2862-2870

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1472

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. MRC [G0500966] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0500966] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [G0500966] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The existence of prostate cancer stem cells offers a theoretical explanation for many of the enduring uncertainties surrounding the etiology and treatment of the most commonly diagnosed tumor in US males. The study of cancer stem cells in prostate, as in other complex tissues, is critically dependent on the availability of pure cell populations, a situation complicated by the heterogeneity of prostate tumors. However, selection of cells with a CD133(+)/alpha 2 beta 1 integrin/CD44(+) phenotype enriches for a tumor-initiating population from human prostate cancers. Among the most pressing needs is for enduring therapy in patients who have experienced failure of hormonal treatments. Because the putative cancer stem cell does not express androgen receptor, it is likely to be immune from most androgen-based therapies, and an inherent genetic instability would enable the tumor to develop the new variants present in hormone-refractory disease. Prostate cancer stem cells have a unique gene expression signature that can also be related to Gleason grade and patient outcome. The scarcity of cancer stem cells in a prostate tumor will probably limit their usefulness in cancer diagnosis and prognosis. However, the emergence of new stem-cell therapeutic targets not only will require new assays for efficacy ( because of their relatively quiescent nature), but also holds real promise of more lasting treatments to augment those currently directed against the remaining tumor cells, which comprise 99.9% of tumor mass, but paradoxically have a poor tumor-initiating capacity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据