4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Phase I trial of the novel mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor deforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) administered intravenously daily for 5 days every 2 weeks to patients with advanced malignancies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 361-367

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.0345

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose This phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of deforolimus ( previously known as AP23573; MK-8669), a nonprodrug rapamycin analog, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Patients and Methods Patients were treated using an accelerated titration design with sequential escalating flat doses of deforolimus administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion once daily for 5 consecutive days every 2 weeks (QD x 5) in a 28-day cycle. Safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and tumor response assessments were performed. Results Thirty-two patients received at least one dose of deforolimus ( 3 to 28 mg/d). Three dose-limiting toxicity events of grade 3 mouth sores were reported. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 18.75 mg/d. Common treatment-related adverse events included reversible mouth sores and rash. Whole-blood clearance increased with dose. Pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrated mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition at all dose levels. Four patients ( one each with non-small-cell lung cancer, mixed mullerian tumor [carcinosarcoma], renal cell carcinoma, and Ewing sarcoma) experienced confirmed partial responses, and three additional patients had minor tumor regressions. Conclusion The MTD of this phase I trial using an accelerated titration design was determined to be 18.75 mg/d. Deforolimus was well tolerated and showed encouraging antitumor activity across a broad range of malignancies when administered intravenously on the QD x 5 schedule. On the basis of these overall results, a dose of 12.5 mg/d is being evaluated in phase II trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据