4.7 Article

Structure and clinical relevance of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 26, 期 10, 页码 1742-1751

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.1178

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [T32 5T32CA009085, T32 CA009085] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI075133, 1R01AI075133] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To review the recent advances in the atomic-level understanding of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase (TK). We aim to highlight the current and future importance of these studies for the understanding and treatment of malignancies where EGFR-TK is improperly activated. Methods The analysis was conducted on published crystal structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank (www.pdb.org) using the program O. Results In this review we emphasize how recent EGFR kinase domain crystal structures can explain the mechanisms of activation for L858R and other EGFR-TK mutations, and compare these distinct activating mechanisms with those recently described for the wild-type EGFR. We suggest an atomic-level mechanism for the poor efficacy of lapatinib against tumors with activating EGFR kinase domain point mutations compared with the efficacy of gefitinib and erlotinib, and demonstrate how structural insights help our understanding of acquired resistance to these agents. We also highlight how these new molecular- level structural data are expected to affect the development of EGFR-TK targeted small molecule kinase inhibitors. Conclusion There are now more crystal structures published for the EGFR-TK domain than for any other TK. This wealth of crystallographic information is beginning to describe the mechanisms by which proper regulation of EGFR-TK is lost in disease. These crystal structures are beginning to show how small molecules inhibit EGFR-TK activity and will aid development of EGFR-TK mutant targeted therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据