4.6 Article

Incidence and risk factors for pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 1258-1266

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02554.x

关键词

intensive care unit; nurses; nursing assessment; pressure ulcers; risk assessment

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine the incidence of pressure ulcers occurring at least 48 hours after admission and risk factors for pressure ulcers grade 2-4 in a long-stay surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) population. The incidence of pressure ulcers in intensive care units is larger than in non-intensive environments. Prospective descriptive research design. Using pressure ulcers grade 2-4 as an outcome measure, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors. Data were obtained on a daily basis in a surgical intensive care unit of the University Hospital Leuven between November 2003-March 2004. A total of 520 long-stay (>= 24 hours) intensive care patients were included. Cumulative incidence of pressure ulcers grade 2-4 was 20.1%. The following variables were positively associated with pressure ulcers grade 2-4: history of vascular disease, treatment with Dopamine((R)) or Dobutamine((R)), intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) or continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH), mechanical ventilation. Also preventive measures were statistically positively associated with pressure ulcers grade 2-4: turning, floating heels, alternating mattresses, adequate prevention. The use of sedatives, body temperature above 38.5 degrees C and sitting in chair where negatively associated with pressure ulcers. Pressure ulcers are statistically associated with different risk factors and preventive measures. The identified risk factors are eligible to be included in a new risk assessment scale for patients admitted to intensive care units. The novel insights have implications for risk assessment for patients in intensive care units. Patients admitted to intensive care units have other risk factors for pressure ulcers which are eligible to be included in a new risk assessment scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据