4.3 Article

Outcomes and patterns of care in adult skull base chordomas from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 1490-1496

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.02.008

关键词

Chordoma; Population study; Radiation therapy; Skull base tumors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to demonstrate survival rates and treatment patterns among patients with chordomas of the skull base using a large population database. Patients with cranial chordomas between 1973 and 2009 were identified from the USA Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) public use database. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine the effect of surgery and radiation on overall survival. We identified 394 patients with histologically-confirmed cranial chordomas. Median survival was 151 months. Most patients (89.09%) underwent surgery. Less than half (44.92%) received radiation after diagnosis. Patients who underwent surgical resection survived significantly longer than those who did not undergo resection, regardless of other treatments (151 versus 81 months, p < 0.001). Ten year survival was lower among patients receiving radiation (44.8% versus 61.4%, p = 0.66). Surgery predicted better overall survival by univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.603, p = 0.0293); younger age at diagnosis (HR 1.028, p < 0.001), and later year of diagnosis (HR 0.971, p = 0.0027) were prognostic of improved survival in a multivariate model. In subgroup analysis of patients with documented tumor size, smaller tumor size (HR 1.021, p = 0.0067), younger age (HR 1.031, p = 0.001), and treatment within a higher volume registry (HR 0.490, p = 0.0129) predicted improved survival. Surgical intervention offers survival benefit for cranial chordomas. Findings of decreased survival in patients receiving radiation may be associated with selection. Studies examining surgical extent of resection data and radiation details are needed to determine the impact of radiotherapy. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据