4.3 Article

Effect of impulse control disorders on disability and quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 63-66

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.02.032

关键词

Activity of daily living; Idiopathic Parkinson's disease; Impulse control and related disorders; Quality of life

资金

  1. Parkinson's Australia
  2. Westmead Movement Disorder Clinic
  3. Nepean Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impulse control and related disorders (ICRD) are not uncommon in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD). The present study aimed to investigate the effects of ICRD on quality of life (QoL) and disability in PD. From two movement disorder clinics in Sydney, Australia, 100 consecutive patients with PD were included in the trial. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Mini Mental State Examination and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 were used to measure disease severity, cognition and disease-specific QoL. The diagnosis of ICRD was based on face-to-face structured clinical interview's by three psychiatrists with experience in ICRD using the Expanded Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Related/Spectrum Disorders. ICRD were present in 15% of our patient population, and had a negative impact on QoL and Activity of Daily Living (ADL) scores. After adjusting for the presence of major depressive disorders and PD duration, the effect on emotional wellbeing remained statistically significant (p < 0.004). Disease duration also correlated with worse QoL and ADL scores. Major depression disorders reduced QoL but not ADL. Patients with ICRD tended to suffer more from depression than those without ICRD. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, major depressive disorders, PD duration, total levodopa equivalent daily dose, use of dopamine agonists, or UPDRS motor score between patients with and without ICDR. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据