4.7 Article

Virulence Gene Profiles and Population Genetic Analysis for Exploration of Pathogenic Serogroups of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 51, 期 12, 页码 4022-4028

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01598-13

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [13J05234] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infection with Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is a serious public health concern, causing severe diarrhea and hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Patient symptoms are varied among STEC strains, possibly implying the presence of markers for STEC virulence other than Stx. To reveal the genotypic traits responsible for STEC virulence, we investigated 282 strains of various serogroups for the presence of 17 major virulence genes, i.e., stx1, stx(2a), stx(2c), stx(2d), stx(2e), stx(2f), eae, tir, espB, espD, iha, saa, subA, ehxA, espP, katP, and stcE. Next, we examined the prevalence of virulence genes according to the seropathotypes in which serotypes were classified (seropathotypes A through E) based on the reported frequencies in human illness, as well as known associations with outbreaks and with severe disease. Our results demonstrate that the presence of both katP and stcE in STEC, in addition to the genes located in the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), including eae, tir, espB, and espD, may indicate the most pathogenic genotype of STEC. A population structure analysis of the profiles of virulence genes statistically supported the pathogenic genotype and, furthermore, revealed that there are serogroups with potentially higher pathogenicity than previously thought. Some strains in serogroups O26, O145, and O165 may have high virulence equivalent to that of serogroup O157. Several serogroups, including O14, O16, O45, O63, O74, 119, O128, and O untypeable, also may be potentially pathogenic, although rarely in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据