4.7 Article

Correlation of MIC with outcome for Candida species tested against caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin:: Analysis and proposal for interpretive MIC breakpoints

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 46, 期 8, 页码 2620-2629

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00566-08

关键词

-

资金

  1. Astellas
  2. Merck
  3. Pfizer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CLSI Antifungal Subcommittee followed the M23-A2 blueprint to develop interpretive MIC breakpoints for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin against Candida species. MICs of <= 2 mu g/ml for all three echinocandins encompass 98.8 to 100% of all clinical isolates of Candida spp. without bisecting any species group and represent a concentration that is easily maintained throughout the dosing period. Data from phase III clinical trials demonstrate that the standard dosing regimens for each of these agents may be used to treat infections due to Candida spp. for which MICs are as high as 2 mu g/ml. An MIC predictive of resistance to these agents cannot be defined based on the data from clinical trials due to the paucity of isolates for which MICs exceed 2 mu g/ml. The clinical data set included only three isolates from patients treated with an echinocandin (caspofungin) for which the MICs were > 2 mu g/ml (two C. parapsilosis isolates at 4 mu g/ml and one C. rugosa isolate at 8 mu g/ml). Based on these data, the CLSI subcommittee has decided to recommend a susceptible only breakpoint MIC of <= 2 mu g/ml due to the lack of echinocandin resistance in the population of Candida isolates thus far. Isolates for which MICs exceed 2 mu g/ml should be designated nonsusceptible (NS). For strains yielding results suggestive of an NS category, the organism identification and antimicrobial-susceptibility test results should be confirmed. Subsequently, the isolates should be submitted to a reference laboratory that will confirm the results by using a CLSI reference dilution method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据