4.5 Article

Albuminuria, Proteinuria, and Urinary Albumin to Protein Ratio in Chronic Kidney Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 82-92

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.21487

关键词

albuminuria; chronic kidney disease; proteinuria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Both albuminuria and proteinuria are important disease markers of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Their relationship and the ratio between urinary albumin and protein in patients with CKD have not been investigated. Whether clinical features can affect these measurements is not clear. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 602 CKD patients. Demographic data, including age, gender, and co-morbidity such as diabetes, hypertension, hyperuricemia, and hyperlipidemia, were reviewed and recorded. Their urinary albumin, total protein, and creatinine were determined and urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR), total protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR), and albumin to total protein ratio (UAPR) were calculated. Their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated according to serum creatinine. The correlation between UACR and UPCR was thus analyzed. We also investigated factors associated with these urinary measurements. Results: UACR and UPCR increased progressively as renal function deteriorated, while UAPR increased to a plateau in CKD stage 4. There was direct relationship between UACR and UPCR. UAPR rose exponentially with the increase of both UACR and UPCR when UACR <500 mg/g or UPCR <1,000 mg/g. Multivariate regression analysis revealed diabetes and hyperuricemia were associated with increased UACR and UPCR, while both urinary parameters were inversely related to male gender and eGFR. Diabetes and hyperuricemia were associated with increased UAPR and UAPR was negatively correlated with age and eGFR. Conclusion: There was a significant association between UACR and UPCR in patients with CKD. Characteristics of patients, renal function, and co-morbidities all affected UACR, UPCR, and UAPR. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 26:82-92, 2012. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据