4.8 Article

ER stress regulates myeloid-derived suppressor cell fate through TRAIL-R-mediated apoptosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 124, 期 6, 页码 2626-2639

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI74056

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [CA084488]
  2. Moffitt lung SPORE [P50 CA119997]
  3. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
  4. Wistar Institute
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26290059] Funding Source: KAKEN
  6. BBSRC [BBS/E/F/00044446] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/F/00044446] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) dampen the immune response thorough inhibition of T cell activation and proliferation and often are expanded in pathological conditions. Here, we studied the fate of MDSCs in cancer. Unexpectedly, MDSCs had lower viability and a shorter half-life in tumor-bearing mice compared with neutrophils and monocytes. The reduction of MDSC viability was due to increased apoptosis, which was mediated by increased expression of TNF-related apoptosis-induced ligand receptors (TRAIL-Rs) in these cells. Targeting TRAIL-Rs in naive mice did not affect myeloid cell populations, but it dramatically reduced the presence of MDSCs and improved immune responses in tumor-bearing mice. Treatment of myeloid cells with proinflammatory cytokines did not affect TRAIL-R expression; however, induction of ER stress in myeloid cells recapitulated changes in TRAIL-R expression observed in tumor-bearing hosts. The ER stress response was detected in MDSCs isolated from cancer patients and tumor-bearing mice, but not in control neutrophils or monocytes, and blockade of ER stress abrogated tumor-associated changes in TRAIL-Rs. Together, these data indicate that MDSC pathophysiology is linked to ER stress, which shortens the lifespan of these cells in the periphery and promotes expansion in BM. Furthermore, TRAIL-Rs can be considered as potential targets for selectively inhibiting MDSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据