4.8 Article

Flow-dependent epigenetic DNA methylation regulates endothelial gene expression and atherosclerosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 124, 期 7, 页码 3187-3199

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI74792

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [HL095070, HL114772, HL113451]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the NIH through a Program of Excellence in Nanotechnology award [HHSN268201000043C]
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  4. Ada Lee and Pete Correll Professorship
  5. John and Jan Portman Professorship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In atherosclerosis, plaques preferentially develop in arterial regions of disturbed blood flow (d-flow), which alters endothelial gene expression and function. Here, we determined that d-flow regulates genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in a DNA methyltransferase-dependent (DNMT-dependent) manner. Induction of d-flow by partial carotid ligation surgery in a murine model induced DNMT1 in arterial endothelium. In cultured endothelial cells, DNMT1 was enhanced by oscillatory shear stress (OS), and reduction of DNMT with either the inhibitor 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5Aza) or siRNA markedly reduced OS-induced endothelial inflammation. Moreover, administration of 5Aza reduced lesion formation in 2 mouse models of atherosclerosis. Using both reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and microarray, we determined that d-flow in the carotid artery resulted in hypermethylation within the promoters of 11 mechanosensitive genes and that 5Aza treatment restored normal methylation patterns. Of the identified genes, HoxA5 and Klf3 encode transcription factors that contain cAMP response elements, suggesting that the methylation status of these loci could serve as a mechanosensitive master switch in gene expression. Together, our results demonstrate that d-flow controls epigenomic DNA methylation patterns in a DNMT-dependent manner, which in turn alters endothelial gene expression and induces atherosclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据