4.8 Article

Orexin neurons suppress narcolepsy via 2 distinct efferent pathways

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 124, 期 2, 页码 604-616

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI71017

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [24390052, 23659134]
  2. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  3. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan [LS048]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24390052, 13J00940, 26220207, 23659134] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The loss of orexin neurons in humans is associated with the sleep disorder narcolepsy, which is characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. Mice lacking orexin peptides, orexin neurons, or orexin receptors recapitulate human narcolepsy phenotypes, further highlighting a critical role for orexin signaling in the maintenance of wakefulness. Despite the known role of orexin neurons in narcolepsy, the precise neural mechanisms downstream of these neurons remain unknown. We found that targeted restoration of orexin receptor expression in the dorsal raphe (DR) and in the locus coeruleus (LC) of mice lacking orexin receptors inhibited cataplexy-like episodes and pathological fragmentation of wakefulness (i.e., sleepiness), respectively. The suppression of cataplexy-like episodes correlated with the number of serotonergic neurons restored with orexin receptor expression in the DR, while the consolidation of fragmented wakefulness correlated with the number of noradrenergic neurons restored in the LC. Furthermore, pharmacogenetic activation of these neurons using designer receptor exclusively activated by designer drug (DREADD) technology ameliorated narcolepsy in mice lacking orexin neurons. These results suggest that DR serotonergic and LC noradrenergic neurons play differential roles in orexin neuron-dependent regulation of sleep/wakefulness and highlight a pharmacogenetic approach for the amelioration of narcolepsy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据