4.8 Article

Requirement of enhanced Survival Motoneuron protein imposed during neuromuscular junction maturation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 124, 期 2, 页码 785-800

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI72017

关键词

-

资金

  1. Association Francaise Contre Les Myopathies (AFM)
  2. SMA Europe
  3. Muscular Dystrophy Association
  4. Department of Defense [W81XWH-11-1-0753]
  5. Families of SMA
  6. NIH [R01 NS057482]
  7. Catalan Government (Generalitat) [2009SGR01248]
  8. Rovira i Virgili University [2010BRDI-06-18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinal muscular atrophy is a common motor neuron disease caused by low survival motoneuron (SMN), a key protein in the proper splicing of genes. Restoring the protein is therefore a promising therapeutic strategy. Implementation of this strategy, however, depends on defining the temporal requirements for SMN. Here, we used controlled knockdown of SMN in transgenic mice to determine the precise postnatal stage requirements for this protein. Reducing SMN in neonatal mice resulted in a classic SMA-like phenotype. Unexpectedly, depletion of SMN in adults had relatively little effect. Insensitivity to low SMN emerged abruptly at postnatal day 17, which coincided with establishment of the fully mature neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Mature animals depleted of SMN eventually exhibited evidence of selective neuromuscular pathology that was made worse by traumatic injury. The ability to regenerate the mature NMJ in aged or injured SMN-depleted mice was grossly impaired, a likely consequence of the inability to meet the surge in demand for motoneuronal SMN that was seen in controls. Our results demonstrate that relative maturity of the NMJ determines the temporal requirement for the SMN protein. These observations suggest that the use of potent but potentially deleterious SMN-enhancing agents could be tapered in human patients once the neuromuscular system matures and reintroduced as needed to enhance SMN for remodeling aged or injured NMJs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据