4.8 Article

RSK3/4 mediate resistance to PI3K pathway inhibitors in breast cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 123, 期 6, 页码 2551-2563

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI66343

关键词

-

资金

  1. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  2. European Research Council [AdG09250244]
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [Intrasalud PSO9/00623]
  4. Novartis
  5. FERO foundation
  6. DFCI-Novartis Drug Discovery Program [R01 CA130988, RC2 CA148268, U54CA112962]
  7. Snyder Medical Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The PI3K signaling pathway regulates diverse cellular processes, including proliferation, survival, and metabolism, and is aberrantly activated in human cancer. As such, numerous compounds targeting the PI3K pathway are currently being clinically evaluated for the treatment of cancer, and several have shown some early indications of efficacy in breast cancer. However, resistance against these agents, both de novo and acquired, may ultimately limit the efficacy of these compounds. Here, we have taken a systematic functional approach to uncovering potential mechanisms of resistance to PI3K inhibitors and have identified several genes whose expression promotes survival under conditions of PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/mTOR) blockade, including the ribosomal S6 kinases RPS6KA2 (RSK3) and RPS6KA6 (RSK4). We demonstrate that overexpression of RSK3 or RSK4 supports proliferation upon PI3K inhibition both in vitro and in vivo, in part through the attenuation of the apoptotic response and upregulation of protein translation. Notably, the addition of MEK- or RSK-specific inhibitors can overcome these resistance phenotypes, both in breast cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models with elevated levels of RSK activity. These observations provide a strong rationale for the combined use of RSK and PI3K pathway inhibitors to elicit favorable responses in breast cancer patients with activated RSK.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据