4.8 Article

Epithelial stem cell mutations that promote squamous cell carcinoma metastasis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 123, 期 10, 页码 4390-4404

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI65856

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [CA89849, DE15953, DE20649, DE019712, CA149456, CA052607, T32 CA 174648]
  2. Radiological Society of North America Medical Student Research Grant
  3. University of Colorado School of Medicine Research Track
  4. University of Colorado Cancer Center FACS Core [P30 CA046934]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) originate in stratified epithelia, with a small subset becoming metastatic. Epithelial stem cells are targets for driver mutations that give rise to SCCs, but it is unknown whether they contribute to oncogenic multipotency and metastasis. We developed a mouse model of SCC by targeting two frequent genetic mutations in human SCCs, oncogene Kras(G12D) activation and Smad4 deletion, to mouse keratin 15-expressing (K15(+)) stem cells. We show that transgenic mice developed multilineage tumors, including metastatic SCCs. Among cancer stem cell-enriched (CSC-enriched) populations, those with increased side population (SP) cells correlated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and lung metastasis. We show that microRNA-9 (miR-9) contributed to SP expansion and metastasis, and miR-9 inhibition reduced the number of SP cells and metastasis. Increased miR-9 was detected in metastatic human primary SCCs and SCC metastases, and miR-9-transduced. human SCC cells exhibited increased invasion. We identified a-catenin as a predominant miR-9 target. Increased miR-9 in human SCC metastases correlated with a-catenin loss but not E-cadherin loss. Our results demonstrate that stem cells with Kras(G12D) activation and Smad4 depletion can produce tumors that are multipotent and susceptible to EMT and metastasis. Additionally, tumor initiation and metastatic properties of CSCs can be uncoupled, with miR-9 regulating the expansion of metastatic CSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据