4.8 Article

Efficacious proteasome/HDAC inhibitor combination therapy for primary effusion lymphoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 123, 期 6, 页码 2616-2628

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI64503

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH Center for AIDS Research [5P30AI073961-05]
  2. NIH [NCI2U01CA121947-04, CA109335, CA122105]
  3. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society [M0901391]
  4. NIH NCI [PO1-CA-128115-01A2, CA136387]
  5. Dwoskin Family Foundation
  6. Recio Foundation
  7. University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a rare form of aggressive B cell lymphoma caused by Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV). Current chemotherapy approaches result in dismal outcomes, and there is an urgent need for new PEL therapies. Previously, we established, in a direct xenograft model of PEL-bearing immune-compromised mice, that treatment with the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib (Btz), increased survival relative to that after treatment with doxorubicin. Herein, we demonstrate that the combination of Btz with the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor suberoylanilidehydroxamic acid (SAHA, also known as vorinostat) potently reactivates KSHV lytic replication and induces PEL cell death, resulting in significantly prolonged survival of PEL-bearing mice. Importantly, Btz blocked KSHV late lytic gene expression, terminally inhibiting the full lyric cascade and production of infectious virus in vivo. Btz treatment led to caspase activation and induced DNA damage, as evidenced by the accumulation of phosphorylated gamma H2AX and p53. The addition of SAHA to Btz treatment was synergistic, as SAHA induced early acetylation of p53 and reduced interaction with its negative regulator MDM2, augmenting the effects of Btz. The eradication of KSHV-infected PEL cells without increased viremia in mice provides a strong rationale for using the proteasome/HDAC inhibitor combination therapy in PEL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据