4.8 Article

ChIP sequencing of cyclin D1 reveals a transcriptional role in chromosomal instability in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 122, 期 3, 页码 833-843

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI60256

关键词

-

资金

  1. Susan Komen Breast Cancer Foundation [BCTR0504227, PDF2000167]
  2. NIH [R01CA70896, R01CA75503, R01CA86072, R01CA55909, R01CA12934]
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. Pennsylvania Department of Health
  5. Murray-Heilig Fund in Molecular Medicine
  6. NIH Cancer Center Core [P30CA56036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromosomal instability (CIN) in tumors is characterized by chromosomal abnormalities and an altered gene expression signature; however, the mechanism of CIN is poorly understood. CCND1 (which encodes cyclin D1) is overexpressed in human malignancies and has been shown to play a direct role in transcriptional regulation. Here, we used genome-wide ChIP sequencing and found that the DNA-bound form of cyclin D1 occupied the regulatory region of genes governing chromosomal integrity and mitochondrial biogenesis. Adding cyclin D1 back to Ccnd1(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts resulted in CIN gene regulatory region occupancy by the DNA-bound form of cyclin D1 and induction of CIN gene expression. Furthermore, increased chromosomal aberrations, aneuploidy, and centrosome abnormalities were observed in the cyclin D1-rescued cells by spectral karyotyping and immunofluorescence. To assess cyclin D1 effects in vivo, we generated transgenic mice with acute and continuous mammary gland-targeted cyclin D1 expression. These transgenic mice presented with increased tumor prevalence and signature CIN gene profiles. Additionally, interrogation of gene expression from 2,254 human breast tumors revealed that cyclin D1 expression correlated with CIN in luminal B breast cancer. These data suggest that cyclin D1 contributes to CIN and tumorigenesis by directly regulating a transcriptional program that governs chromosomal stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据