4.8 Article

A mutation in the immunoproteasome subunit PSMB8 causes autoinflammation and lipodystrophy in humans

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 121, 期 10, 页码 4150-4160

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI58414

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21590536, 21570169, 20679005, 21000012, 23657083, 23591236, 23791179] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteasomes are multisubunit proteases that play a critical role in maintaining cellular function through the selective degradation of ubiquitinated proteins. When 3 additional beta subunits, expression of which is induced by IFN-gamma, are substituted for their constitutively expressed counterparts, the structure is converted to an immunoproteasome. However, the underlying roles of immunoproteasomes in human diseases are poorly understood. Using exome analysis, we found a homozygous missense mutation (G197V) in immunoproteasome subunit, beta type 8 (PSMB8), which encodes one of the beta subunits induced by IFN-gamma in patients from 2 consanguineous families. Patients bearing this mutation suffered from autoinflammatory responses that included recurrent fever and nodular erythema together with lipodystrophy. This mutation increased assembly intermediates of immunoproteasomes, resulting in decreased proteasome function and ubiquitin-coupled protein accumulation in the patient's tissues. In the patient's skin and B cells, IL-6 was highly expressed, and there was reduced expression of PSMB8. Downregulation of PSMB8 inhibited the differentiation of murine and human adipocytes in vitro, and injection of siRNA against Psmb8 in mouse skin reduced adipocyte tissue volume. These findings identify PSMB8 as an essential component and regulator not only of inflammation, but also of adipocyte differentiation, and indicate that immunoproteasomes have pleiotropic functions in maintaining the homeostasis of a variety of cell types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据