4.8 Article

Accelerating axonal growth promotes motor recovery after peripheral nerve injury in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 121, 期 11, 页码 4332-4347

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI58675

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [NS038253, FBG 068678]
  2. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  3. Hong Kong Croucher Foundation
  4. IRP-IFP Switzerland
  5. MICINN/Fulbright program
  6. Fonds de la recherche en sante du Quebec
  7. Massachusetts General Hospital Neuroscience Center Vector Development and Production Core (NIH) [P30NS045776]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although peripheral nerves can regenerate after injury, proximal nerve injury in humans results in minimal restoration of motor function. One possible explanation for this is that injury-induced axonal growth is too slow. Heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27) is a regeneration-associated protein that accelerates axonal growth in vitro. Here, we have shown that it can also do this in mice after peripheral nerve injury. While rapid motor and sensory recovery occurred in mice after a sciatic nerve crush injury, there was little return of motor function after sciatic nerve transection, because of the delay in motor axons reaching their target. This was not due to a failure of axonal growth, because injured motor axons eventually fully re-extended into muscles and sensory function returned; rather, it resulted from a lack of motor end plate reinnervation. Tg mice expressing high levels of Hsp27 demonstrated enhanced restoration of motor function after nerve transection/resuture by enabling motor synapse reinnervation, but only within 5 weeks of injury. In humans with peripheral nerve injuries, shorter wait times to decompression surgery led to improved functional recovery, and, while a return of sensation occurred in all patients, motor recovery was limited. Thus, absence of motor recovery after nerve damage may result from a failure of synapse reformation after prolonged denervation rather than a failure of axonal growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据