4.8 Article

High-mobility group box 1 is involved in the initial events of early loss of transplanted islets in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 120, 期 3, 页码 735-743

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI41360

关键词

-

资金

  1. Global FU Program of Fukuoka University
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare , Japan
  3. Shimura Memorial Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Islet transplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus is limited in its clinical application mainly due to early loss of the transplanted islets, resulting in low transplantation efficiency. NKT cell-dependent IFN-gamma production by Gr-1(+)CD11b(+) cells is essential for this loss, but the upstream events in the process remain undetermined. Here, we have demonstrated that high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) plays a crucial role in the initial events of early loss of transplanted islets in a mouse model of diabetes. Pancreatic islets contained abundant HMGB1, which was released into the circulation soon after islet transplantation into the liver. Treatment with an HMGB1-specific antibody prevented the early islet graft loss and inhibited IFN-gamma production by NKT cells and Gr-1(+)CD11b(+) cells. Moreover, mice lacking either of the known HMGB 1 receptors TLR2 or receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), but not the known HMGB I receptor TLR4, failed to exhibit early islet graft loss. Mechanistically, HMGB1 stimulated hepatic mononuclear cells (MNCs) in vivo and in vitro; in particular, it upregulated CD40 expression and enhanced IL-12 production by DCs, leading to NKT cell activation and subsequent NKT cell-dependent augmented IFN-gamma production by Gr-1(+)CD11b(+) cells. Thus, treatment with either IL-12- or CD40L-specific antibody prevented the early islet graft loss. These findings indicate that the HMGB1-mediated pathway eliciting early islet loss is a potential target for intervention to improve the efficiency of islet transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据