4.8 Article

A molecular switch controls interspecies prion disease transmission in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 120, 期 7, 页码 2590-2599

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI42051

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation
  3. NIH [K08-AI01802, 5R21NS055116]
  4. National Competence Center for Research on Neural Plasticity and Repair
  5. Competence Center for Research on Structural Biology
  6. Foundation for Research at the University of Zurich
  7. US National Prion Research Program
  8. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  9. ETH Zurich

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies are lethal neurodegenerative disorders that present with aggregated forms of the cellular prion protein (PrPC), which are known as PrPSc. Prions from different species vary considerably in their transmissibility to xenogeneic hosts. The variable transmission barriers depend on sequence differences between incoming PrPSc and host PrPC and additionally, on strain-dependent conformational properties of PrPSc. The beta(2)-alpha(2) loop region within PrPC varies substantially between species, with its structure being influenced by the residue types in the 2 amino acid sequence positions 170 (most commonly S or N) and 174 (N or T). In this study, we inoculated prions from 5 different species into transgenic mice expressing either disordered-loop or rigid-loop PrPC variants. Similar beta 2-alpha 2 loop structures correlated with efficient transmission, whereas dissimilar loops correlated with strong transmission barriers. We then classified literature data on cross-species transmission according to the 170S/N polymorphism. Transmission barriers were generally low between species with the same amino acid residue in position 170 and high between those with different residues. These findings point to a triggering role of the local beta 2-alpha 2 loop structure for prion transmissibility between different species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据