4.8 Article

Bestrophin-2 mediates bicarbonate transport by goblet cells in mouse colon

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 120, 期 5, 页码 1722-1735

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI41129

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [GM60448, EY014852, EY13160]
  2. American Health Assistance Foundation
  3. Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science at the University of Arizona
  4. Emory University [P30 EY006360]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anion transport by the colonic mucosa maintains the hydration and pH of the colonic lumen, and its disruption causes a variety of diarrheal diseases. Cholinergic agonists raise cytosolic Ca2+ levels and stimulate anion secretion, but the mechanisms underlying this effect remain unclear. Cholinergic stimulation of anion secretion may occur via activation of Ca2+-activated Cl- channels (CaCCs) or an increase in the Cl- driving force through CFTR after activation of Ca2+-dependent K+ channels. Here we investigated the role of a candidate CaCC protein, bestrophin-2 (Best2), using Best2(-/-) mice. Cholinergic stimulation of anion current was greatly reduced in Best2(-/-) mice, consistent with our proposed role for Best2 as a CaCC. However, immunostaining revealed Best2 localized to the basolateral membrane of mucin-secreting colonic goblet cells, not the apical membrane of Cl--secreting enterocytes. In addition, in the absence of HCO3-, cholinergic-activated current was identical in control and Best2(-/-) tissue preparations, which suggests that most of the Best2 current was carried by HCO3-. These data delineate an alternative model of cholinergic regulation of colonic anion secretion in which goblet cells play a critical role in HCO3- homeostasis. We therefore propose that Best2 is a HCO3- channel that works in concert with a Cl:HCO3- exchanger in the apical membrane to affect transcellular HCO3- transport. Furthermore, previous models implicating CFTR in cholinergic Cl- secretion may be explained by substantial downregulation of Best2 in Cftr(-/-) mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据