4.8 Article

NCRs and DNAM-1 mediate NK cell recognition and lysis of human and mouse melanoma cell lines in vitro and in vivo

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 119, 期 5, 页码 1251-1263

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI36022

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro
  3. Swedish Cancer Society
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. Karolinska Institutet
  6. Dr. Mildred Scheel Foundation for Cancer Research [106096]
  7. MRC [G0501150] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/B/00001212, BBS/E/B/0000C212] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [G0501150] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NK cells use a variety of receptors to detect abnormal cells, including tumors and their metastases. However, in the case of melanoma, it remains to be determined what specific molecular interactions are involved and whether NK cells control metastatic progression and/or the route of dissemination. Here we show that human melanoma cell lines derived from LN metastases express ligands for natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCRs) and DNAX accessory molecule-1 (DNAM-1), two emerging NK cell receptors key for cancer cell recognition, but not NK group 2 member D (NKG2D). Compared with cell lines derived from metastases taken from other anatomical sites, LN metastases were more susceptible to NK cell lysis and preferentially targeted by adoptively transferred NK cells in a xenogeneic model of cell therapy. In mice, DNAM-1 and NCR ligands were also found on spontaneous melanomas and melanoma cell lines. Interference with DNAM-1 and NCRs by antibody blockade or genetic disruption reduced killing of melanoma cells. Taken together, these results show that DNAM-1 and NCRs are critical for NK cell-mediated innate immunity to melanoma cells and provide a background to design NK cell-based immunotherapeutic strategies against melanoma and possibly other tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据