4.8 Article

Cd1d-dependent regulation of bacterial colonization in the intestine of mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 119, 期 5, 页码 1241-1250

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI36509

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ter Meulen Fund
  2. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  3. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  4. NIH [DK44319, DK51362, DK53056]
  5. Harvard Digestive Diseases Center [DK034854]
  6. Grant-in-Aid for Research of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19591184]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21591301, 19591184] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accumulation of certain species of bacteria in the intestine is involved in both tissue homeostasis and immune-mediated pathologies. The host mechanisms involved in controlling intestinal colonization with commensal bacteria are poorly understood. We observed that under specific pathogen-free or germ-free conditions, intragastric administration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, or Lactobacillus gasseri resulted in increased colonization of the small intestine and bacterial translocation in mice lacking Cd1d, an MHC class I-like molecule, compared with WT mice. In contrast, activation of Cd1d-restricted T cells (NKT cells) with alpha-galactosylceramide caused diminished intestinal colonization with the same bacterial strains. We also found prominent differences in the composition of intestinal microbiota, including increased adherent bacteria, in Cd1d(-/-) mice in comparison to WT mice under specific pathogen-free conditions. Germ-free Cd1d(-/-) mice exhibited a defect in Paneth cell granule ultrastructure and ability to degranulate after bacterial colonization. In vitro, NKT cells were shown to induce the release of lysozyme from intestinal crypts. Together, these data support a role for Cd1d in regulating intestinal colonization through mechanisms that include the control of Paneth cell function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据