4.6 Article

A Randomized, Controlled Dose-Finding Phase II Study of the M72/AS01 Candidate Tuberculosis Vaccine in Healthy PPD-Positive Adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 1360-1375

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10875-013-9949-3

关键词

Tuberculosis; vaccine; M72 antigen; AS01; CD4(+) T cells

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S.A.
  2. Aeras Global TB Vaccine Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this dose-finding Phase II study (NCT00621322), we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of different formulations of the candidate tuberculosis vaccine containing the M72 antigen (10/20/40 mu g doses) and the liposome-based AS01 Adjuvant System. We aimed to select the lowest-dose combination of M72 and AS01 that was clinically well tolerated with immunogenicity comparable to that of the previously tested M72/AS01(B) (40 mu g) candidate vaccine. Healthy PPD-positive (induration 3-10 mm) adults (18-45 years) in The Philippines were randomized (4:4:4:4:1:1) to receive 2 injections, 1 month apart, of M72/AS01(B) (40 mu g), M72/AS01(E) (10 mu g), M72/AS01(E) (20 mu g), M72/AS02(D) (10 mu g), M72/Saline (40 mu g) or AS01(B) alone, and were followed up for 6 months. AS01(E) and AS02(D) contain half the quantities of the immunostimulants present in AS01(B). AS02(D) is an oil-in-water emulsion. Vaccine selection was based on the CD4(+) T-cell responses at 1 month post vaccination. All formulations had a clinically acceptable safety profile with no vaccine-related serious adverse events reported. Two vaccinations of each adjuvanted M72 vaccine induced M72-specific CD4(+) T-cell and humoral responses persisting at 6 months post vaccination. No responses were observed with AS01(B) alone. One month post second vaccination, CD4(+) T-cell responses induced by each of the three M72/AS01 vaccine formulations were of comparable magnitudes, and all were significantly higher than those induced by M72/AS02(D) (10 mu g) and M72/Saline. The formulation with the lowest antigen and adjuvant dose, M72/AS01(E) (10 mu g), fulfilled our pre-defined selection criteria and has been selected for further clinical development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据