4.6 Article

The Immunologic Functions of the Neonatal Fc Receptor for IgG

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 S9-S17

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10875-012-9768-y

关键词

Neonatal Fc receptor; FcRn; Maternal IgG; transcytosis

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [RA 2040/1-1]
  2. NIH [DK071798, CA034196, AR054407, DK48106, DK084424, DK090603, DK44319, DK51362, DK53056, DK88199]
  3. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  4. Global COE Program
  5. Global Center of Excellence for Education and Research on Signal Transduction Medicine in the Coming Generation
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  7. Harvard Digestive Diseases Center [NIH P30DK034854]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Careful regulation of the body's immunoglobulin G (IgG) and albumin concentrations is necessitated by the importance of their respective functions. As such, the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), as a single receptor, is capable of regulating both of these molecules and has become an important focus of investigation. In addition to these essential protection functions, FcRn possesses a number of other functions that are equally as critical and are increasingly coming to attention. During the very first stages of life, FcRn mediates the passive transfer of IgG from mother to offspring both before and after birth. In the adult, FcRn regulates the persistence of both IgG and albumin in the serum as well as the movement of IgG, and any bound cargo, between different compartments of the body via transcytosis across polarized cells. FcRn is also expressed by hematopoietic cells; consistent with this, FcRn regulates MHC class II presentation and MHC class I cross-presentation by dendritic cells. As such, FcRn plays an important role in immune surveillance throughout adult life. The increasing appreciation for FcRn in both homeostatic and pathological conditions is generating an intense interest in the potential for therapeutic modulation of FcRn binding to IgG and albumin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据