4.6 Article

Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous VivaglobinA® Replacement Therapy in Previously Untreated Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency: A Prospective, Multicenter Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 952-961

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10875-011-9588-5

关键词

Primary immunodeficiency; subcutaneous immunoglobulin; local tolerability; serum IgG levels

资金

  1. CSL Behring AG, Berne, Switzerland
  2. Hospital St. Georg GmbH Leipzig, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  3. Unidad de Inmunolog a Clinica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Departamento Microbiolog a I e Inmunologia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  4. CSL Behring, Baxter
  5. Baxter
  6. CSL Behring
  7. Fondo de Investigacion Instituto Carlos III
  8. GlaxoSmithKline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment of primary immunodeficiency (PI) is typically initiated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) loading and then continued with IVIG or subcutaneous IgG (SCIG). This prospective, open-label, multicenter, 6-month study evaluated a new regimen of initiating IgG therapy with SCIG in 18 previously untreated patients. In the loading phase, SCIG 100 mg/kg was administered for five consecutive days (total loading dose 500 mg/kg). During the maintenance phase, patients self-infused SCIG 100 mg/kg/week at home. The primary efficacy endpoint of IgG levels a parts per thousand yen5 g/L on day 12 was achieved in 17 patients (94.4%; 95% CI 0.727, 0.999). The rate of infections was 3.95 episodes/patient/year. Improvement was found in many subscales of the health-related quality of life questionnaires. SCIG treatment was well tolerated, with no related serious adverse events (AEs). Nine (50%) patients experienced related AEs, including local reactions (rate 0.105 events/infusion). The results suggest that therapy of newly diagnosed patients with PI can be initiated directly with SCIG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据